Í Júlí 2007, við saga Amanda Skegg sýning hana kynþokkafullur líkami íGlaumglosi, einn af the vinsæll fullorðinn tímarit. Þú geta sjá hana neðansjávar-, í the grunnur laug af vatn og í the sandur.
Áður við halda áfram, hver er Amanda Skegg?

Amanda Skegg er óákveðinn greinir í ensku Ameríkumaður Ólympískur sundmaður og líkan. Hún hana fyrstur Ólympískur framkoma á the 1996 leikur á the aldur af 14. Nú, í alger, hún hefur tveir gullsmiður, fjórir fiskur með silfraða rák á hvorri hlið og einn brons í 1996, 2000 og 2004 Ólympíuleikar með óákveðinn greinir í ensku Ólympískur hljómplata (200- landamörk bringusund, 2 mínúta 23.37 annars flokks varningur)

Í samlagning til hana velgengni í the laug, Amanda Skegg var the sækja skrá af fjarlægri tölvu kvenmaður íþróttamaður á meðan a þrír- mánuður tímabil í 2004. ESPN jafnvel nafndagur hana eins og the Hottest Kvenmaður Íþróttamaður af 2005 og FHM einnig fundarhamar hana the titill af the veröld’ kynjamisrétti íþróttamaður á the kápa í ár 2006. Líkan umboðsskrifstofa hefur innsigli hana upp fyrir Hraði og Rauður Naut auglýsing og annar félagi ákafur til reiðufé í á hana ímynd.


Ef Annálahöfundur Kournikova er the kynþokkafullur helgimynd fyrir tennis, Amanda Skegg vilja vera the einn í sund veröld. Svo, eftir á gera ráð fyrir fyrir the tímarit, réttlátur eins og annar leikfélagi, Amanda Skegg’ Glaumglosi ljósmynd hafa skapa suð.
Skömm til women íþróttamaður? Sumir vera ósammála. Þeir réttlátur hugsa þessi hún er heitur. Eftir allt saman, hún er a þrír- tími Íbúi á fjallinu Ólympos.


Gagnrýnandi þessi Amanda er the kyntákn af the harður- upphlutur íþróttamannslegur veröld. Foreldri sennilega vilja hafa áhyggjur þessi þeirra grunnskóli stúlka vilja vilja til vita hvers vegna þeirra fyrirmynd er ekki þreytandi allir föt.
Dr. María mey Jo Kane, leikstjóri af the Háskóli af Minnesotas’ Matur Sent fyrir Rannsókn á Stúlka og Women í Íþrótt this, “ það vanur eitthvað sem gert var oft vera þessi kvenmaður íþróttamaður varúlfur sýna eins og hollur, Allur- Ameríkumaður stúlka. Nú þú fá kvenmaður íþróttamaður í GQ, Glaumglosi og the Sundbolur tölublað. The afleiðing af það er umfang þessi er mjög skaði — þessi smávægi og spássíuglósur women íþróttamaður því það hjartarskinn ekki gefa þá the virða þeir verðskulda eins og hæfur íþróttamaður”
Hún added, “ ef - élite kvenmaður íþróttamaður hugsa gera ráð fyrir í Glaumglosi er sýning burt þeirra upphlutur eins og hæfur íþróttamaður, þeir ert annar hvor eða skrifpappírsörk”


Skegg er hvorugur né bjáni. Gegn hvaða annar , hún er sviði. Hún vita þessi hana staður til Beijing 2008 er ekki staðfestur og áður the veröld gleyma óður í það, hún hefur til kreista sérhver dollari hún geta út frá hana líkami og frægð. Hana vörumerki er hana líkami og hana stoltur Ólympískur byrja aftur á. Eftir á gera ráð fyrir eins og kápa stúlka fyrirFHM, Heilræði, Myndskreyttur’ sundbolur tölublað og birtast í Hraði auglýsing, hún hefur mikill dollari en hana jafningi. Með þessir frægð ábati frá gera ráð fyrir nakinn í Glaumglosi, hún hefur ala upp hana opinber vangasvipur og staða hún sjálf fyrir a staða- Ólympískur líkan starfsferill. Hún took kostur af hana frægð og hún notaður the tímarit eins og a vegur til draga að sér non- sund fans. Hún er sviði, isnt’ hún?



Skegg er unapologetic óður í hvaða hún kalla hana nýjastur “outside ævintýri”. Hún krafa þessi birtast í þessi tímarit hjartarskinn ekki breyting hana persónuleiki eða hver hún er.
Það er a viðskipti ákvörðun, það er a starfsferill ákvörðun; Það er hana líkami, það er hana réttur.

Fólk ást sigurvegari og fólk ást fallegur manneskja. Amanda Skegg er báðir. Amanda Skegg þessi það mega ekki gera réttlæti til hana orðatiltæki þessi hana ákvörðun í engu að síður smávægi hvaða hún hefur leikinn. Það hjartarskinn ekki, það koma með hvaða hún hefur til a breiður hópur af fólk.
Einnig, lets’ ekki gleyma Amanda er réttlátur a sundmaður. Hún er ekki a körfubolti leikmaður og hún hjartarskinn ekki stjórn a $40 milljón samningur. Né hún a England Fyrstur Bandalag knattspyrna leikmaður hver bráðabirgða- 2 milljón pund a ár.
Þó the summa er ótilgreindur, ÉG trúa þessi hún had viss this Glaumglosi samningur var raunverulega virði the peningar. Réttur eftir á this samningur, hún hefur taka á leigu a leyfisveitandi umboðsskrifstofa til hjálpa þróa vara, eins og ilmur, fatnaður og heimili vara til vera hluti af a undirskrift Amanda Skegg safn. Hún er einnig flokkun í gegnum TV óvinveittur tilboð og a bíómynd skrifletur.

Amanda, hvernig sem, hefur ekki glataður brennidepill í hvaða hún er aðgerð bestur. Hún enn lest nálægt sund fimm óratími a dagur hvenær hún er ekki nema viðskipti á the Háskóli af Arizona eða tal í vörn af í útrýmingarhættu tegund. Aftur, this sýning þessi Amanda vita hana leikur áætlun heilbrigður.
Án frekari fjaðrafok, hér þú ráðast á sumir af the bestur skot íGlaumglosi:
Hér þú ráðast á Amanda Skegg’ ljósmynd íFHM:
Amanda Skegg er ekki the fyrstur og ÉG gera ekki hugsa hún vilja vera the síðastur kona til nota hana líkami fyrir efni annar en íþróttir.
Margir ást seeing góð kaup, heilbrigður líkami tilvera sýna eins og fegurð. ÉG trúa þessi Amanda verksmiðja út og synda eins og brjálaður til fá líkami svona. Réttlátur von þessi Amanda vilja halda áfram til vinna fleiri minnispeningur í Ólympískur ( svo við geta viðurværi seeing hana í tímarit). Að öðru leyti, hún vilja vera sennilega þekktur fleiri fyrir hana fæðingardagur föt en hana sundbolur.
Eins og mikill eins og ÉG eins og seeing fallegur íþróttakona en ÉG enn von þessi vilja standa á þess eiga verðleiki án having kynlíf frumefni. Það er sterkur, en ÉG raunverulega von svo.
Hjartarskinn kynlíf raunverulega selja a íþrótt? ÉG munu vandaður fleiri í minn í this hlutur– Hjartarskinn Kynlíf Enn Selja í ?. Á the meðalvegur tími, þú geta skrá sig út the staða af tveir kynþokkafullur kvenmaður tennis leikmaður – Ashley Harkleroad Birtast í Glaumglosi og Ana Ivanovic Gera ráð fyrir Fyrir FHM

Amanda Skegg sitja fyrir fyrir Hraði auglýsing.

Amanda Skegg birtast nakinn í Fólk fyrir the Siðferðilegur Meðhöndlun af Animals’ ( krónublað) nýjastur herferð í mótmæla af the loðfeldur iðnaður í Tignarlegur 2008 ( áður hana leikur í Beijing Ólympískur 2008).
Did þú eins og this staða? Gerast áskrifandi að til MunFitnessBlog.com í dag. Það er frjáls.
Skyldur Staða
- Bretland Íbúi á fjallinu Ólympos Sitja fyrir Nakinn Fyrir Drykkur Auglýsing
- Ashley Harkleroad Birtast í Glaumglosi og Ana Ivanovic Gera ráð fyrir Fyrir FHM
- Hjartarskinn Kynlíf Enn Selja í ?
- OKKUR Ólympíuleikar Sund Lið óákveðinn greinir í ensku Áhrifamikill Koma aftur í 4100× Landamörk
Rolla dúnn til leyfi a athugasemd. ÉG raunverulega vilja til vita hvaða þú hugsa.
Stofna hvaða þú varúlfur útlit fyrir? Ef ekki, reyna rannsakandi fyrir það niðri.




































































nazlihaffiz /Aug 5, 2007 á 249: Er
tónn heitur nautnalegur Kynþokkafullur.
Definately fundarhamar mig a harður á. Im’ a sogskál fyrir svo sem women.
*slefa eins og Hómerskur*
ibster /Aug 5, 2007 á 712: - promethium
til allrar hamingju þú enn hafa this staða. aldrei got leiðindi lestur ( útlit) það. haha
alfonto /Apr 24, 2008 á 1014: Er
alvarlega, ÉG myndað af did not’ bókamerki þinn blog, ég eini bókamerki this innganga. svo heitur!!
Kelv /Mega 14, 2008 á 1130: - promethium
This er hvers vegna ÉG eins og þinn blog, viðurværi það upp!
skora /Aug 10, 2008 á 357: Er
fjandinn… Amanda Skegg er a hreinskilnislega KYNÞOKKAFULLUR kona, hún hefur óákveðinn greinir í ensku furðulegur líkami og evrything óður í hana er mikill, þessir ert sumir raunverulegur bölvaður heitur pics of
Lisa /Aug 19, 2008 á 450: Er
Amanda Beard took the easy way out. She chose to degrade herself to promote herself more and to profit. Degrading. Boring. Old. Done. Unadmirable. No excuses. All her hard work to become an accomplished athlete for naught.
kate /Oct 5, 2008 at 5:38 PM
I thought all the shots up until playboy and FHM were really nice and up until then, I did not agree with the woman who said “she is either naive or a fool”.
But yeah, those playboy shots: she just looks like a f**k puppet. Sorry. She is, indeed, a fool. She didnt have to go there and she could still have made the money she so obviously craves.
It all goes to show that sports heroes have as much going on up top as pop stars. Boring
Tami /Dec 9, 2008 at 7:47 PM
The top 5 comments (made by men) Just go to show why it’s degrading. “i luckily you still have this post. never got bored reading (looking) it. haha”
sorry to use you ibster as an example.
At no point did ibster mention “yea she achieved alot. I admire her” no it’s all about looking about sexualising. Which takes away from the issue of what she’s done! Unfortunately smart women do understand that the market is run by men. But it’s just sad for ever other girl out there to think “the only way i’m gonna make it is to get naked”
What kind of example is that setting for young girls out there?! “o yea. get your kit off. men love that… and thats all you need to know about life”
Men – Stop making this as the only way for females to do well
Women – Stop falling for this lie.
Rant over…
Clav /Dec 21, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Tami, and all the other women who posted on here – as much as I’d like to agree with your points of view, the simple fact is men have throughout human history have ALWAYS sexualized images of women (in art, sculpture etc) and ALWAYS will, the media today in my mind is just an extension of what’s been happening in the civilised (note the British spelling!) world for centuries – I’m not saying it’s fair but that’s just the way it is.
Your ranting, although well-intentioned, seems a little misguided; if women are SO powerful, intelligent, smart etc in the modern age how exactly do WE make this the only way for females to do well (and maybe you as women should try harder to enlighten those who “fall for this lie”)? If you honestly think that men are going to change millions of years of evolution for your benefit then I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news!
There ARE obviously those female athletes who will never grace the cover of any men’s magazine but given, as the article said, swimming has a relatively low profile I think Amanda’s choice is a smart one. I look at it like this – if I had dedicated my whole life (and all the sacrifice that comes with that) to a non-mainstream chosen sport knowing I probably had a maximum of 8-12 years at the top level I’d take the “easy” way out too – she still has another 50 years to live once she retires and I think it’s only fair to be compensated as much as possible for all those years of dedication, not to mention wanting to have a stable enough financial foundation if she chose to start a family etc. Too many former athletes I know personally have fallen on hard times because they had plowed everything they had into the first 35 years of their life and found it very difficult to adapt to normality…
And to be honest, her Playboy pictures are fine – it’s not as if she’s spread-eagled or anything!
Tami /Jan 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM
Clav Hi :)
So according to you. Because it has been done for centuries I should just shut up and let people get on with it?
I don’t have a problem with someone trying to earn money. I get it, I would just like there to be other ways for women to achieve it. The main problem that I have is that it’s one step to do a playboy cover, but it can be such a downhill slide, especially for those of lesser circumstances who then think that “well if this athelete did it for money. Then I can sell myself in someway and gain money” Whether that way be more or less derogatory.
And how far back are you talking in regards to the civilised world? Greek culture was meant to be civilised and they regarded the male form as more sexual and depicted it as such. But this seems to have died out, along with many other refinements of that civilised (note the British spelling too!!!???) world. But I could be going too far back.
Also with the sexualisation of females and the saturation of it from the media that we have. Is it no wonder that rape has risen? It’s not just the images I care about it’s the message that they send. Boys are getting a warped view of what is real and what isn’t. Not only that, we are of a culture that tells young boys “why are you crying? what are you a girl?” (I’ve said this before!!!) which automatically says “girls are lesser and you can’t show emotions”this in the long run leads to difficulties and can result in the violence we see in the news papers or even on drunken nights out.
It also gives girls a warped message of self worth, “well i have to look sexy” which then leads to “well I have to give a guy whatever he wants”
example – I was out one night and there was a girl out with us in nothing but basically her underwear (heard of Jordon? Paris hilton?) She was a hot girl and men were ALL over here. One of which went to ask her back to his for a “fun time”. She said she’d think about it, to which point he got angry and called her a slut and a fat b*tch that no one would want to sleep with… except him 2 minutes ago. She was wrong to wear what she wore out but he was wrong to expect her to jump into his arms. and this is a common occurance.
OK i’m going off topic, I understand.
To cap it off. Yes men and the media will sexualise women, have done for many years. But I think we all need to learn on both sides. I am a feminist (obviously lol), but I don’t blame men for everything and I definately think women should stand up and take responsiblity for their actions. And females need to lead by example.
As Robin Williams said
God gave man and brain and a penis. But unfortunately only enough blood to run one at a time. :)
Clav /Jan 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Wow Tami… that’s a lot! All I’m saying is, that’s the way of the world, I never said it’s right! I totally disagree with your point about girls being “lesser” though.
Happy New Year to you! :-D
Clav /Jan 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Oh, and there ARE other ways for women to make lots of money – those ways just involve hard work and why would anybody want to do that!? ;-p
Tami /Jan 5, 2009 at 12:15 AM
Lol Clav if it’s not right then don’t let it be the way of the world (^_^o )
AND I never said that girls are lesser. :P So i’m glad you don’t think we are.
Happy new years to you too!!!
Clav /Jan 5, 2009 at 12:20 AM
I’m one man, not a force of nature! Some things will never change including the need human beings have to compare each other visually to determine “status”, sexually and otherwise… I could compare it to being black, I’m fully aware racism isn’t right but I also accept it’s something which will never go away… Doesn’t stop me living and enjoying my life though! :-D
Tami /Jan 5, 2009 at 12:32 AM
(^_^o ) It may not stop you living your life, but it can for others. And you may not be a force of nature, but it doesn’t take a force of nature to change things. Butterfly effect is a scientific theory… hmmm. Watch pay it forwards (very cute film :P)
Just think about it. thats all i’m asking.
To be fair, this issue in the greater scheme of things. Is not really all that important. HOWEVER if we don’t learn to get along in general and understand each other, then how are we ever gonna survive? (feminist and a greenie! watch out! lol)
Live, Laugh, Recycle and Respect. (^_^o )
Clav /Jan 5, 2009 at 12:56 AM
I have thought about it – what I’ve written is my conclusion!
Tami /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:07 AM
LMAO… ok your conclusion is that although you agree, being as you are just one person in the world. There is nothing you can do to change even your outlook on it?
Defeatist much. But thats life.
Clav /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:15 AM
Not defeatist my dear, just a realist. Plus, I got bills to pay and I want an easy life! :-p
Tami /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:19 AM
I feel sorry for you in that case. I’d rather live life to the full and stand up for what I believe in. Who wants an easy life when there are so many exciting challenges? (^_^o )
and it is defeatist as it can change, you just don’t wanna rock the boat.
Clav /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:22 AM
Ah, my sarcasm was evidently lost on you then…
Tami /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:28 AM
lmao. Internet and sarcasm have never crossed easily. (^_^o )
My answer was due to the fact that I know a guy at work who says the exact same thing… sans Sarcasm. Lol
Clav /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:41 AM
Fair enough, it’s all good – and more power to you! :-D
Tami /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:54 AM
Lol this has been fun… we should do this again some time :P
ciao
Clav /Jan 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM
Anytime hun, anytime… lol
alfonto /Jan 5, 2009 at 11:05 AM
you both should exchange number or something. hahah.
happy new year.